Legal Opinion

Voykin v. Estate of DeBoer

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 2000No. 88227PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rathje

This appeal presents the question of whether a defendant must present medical or other competent evidence of a causal or relevancy connection between a plaintiff’s prior injury, prior accident, or preexisting condition and the injury at issue.

BACKGROUND

This action arose from an automobile accident between plaintiff, Mark Voykin, and decedent, Gordon DeBoer. The evidence at trial established that, on January 31, 1996, decedent’s car collided with the rear of plaintiffs car. Although plaintiff did not seek medical attention on the evening of the accident, the next morning, at his wife’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Union Wire Rope Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Walski v. TiesengaIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. People v. MonroeIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Caley v. ManickeIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Marut v. CostelloIllinois Supreme Court · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Heastie v. RobertsIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  2. FGA, INC. v. GiglioNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Arpin Ex Rel. Estate of Arpin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  4. Clayton v. County of CookAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  5. DiCosola v. BowmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API