Legal Opinion
Fortugno v. Hudson Manure Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 23, 1958PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
51 N.J. Super. 482 (1958)
144 A.2d 207
ANTHONY FORTUGNO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT,
v.
HUDSON MANURE COMPANY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS, AND ARTHUR FORTUGNO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT.
ARTHUR FORTUGNO, THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT,
v.
HUDSON MANURE COMPANY, ET AL., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued June 9, 1958.
Decided July 23, 1958.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.
Mr. Roger H. McGlynn argued the cause for Arthur Fortugno, as…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minneapolis Civic & Commerce Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Wendt v. FischerNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Sears, Roebuck Co. v. CampSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
- Vanderbilt v. MitchellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Kugler v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
- Melikian v. CorradettiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Phar-Mor, Inc. v. Coopers & LybrandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- State Capital Title & Abstract Co. v. Pappas Business Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Stochastic Decisions v. DiDomenicoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.