State v. Ogles

DAVIS, Judge.

Brandon Dale Ogles ("Defendant") appeals from his convictions for felonious breaking or entering and attaining the status of a habitual felon. On appeal, he argues that the trial court (1) committed plain error by permitting an officer to testify regarding Defendant's "mug shots"; and (2) erred by failing to intervene ex mero motu during the prosecutor's closing arguments. After a thorough review of the record and applicable law, we conclude that Defendant received a fair trial free from prejudicial error.

Factual and Procedural Background

The State presented evidence at trial…