Legal Opinion

Klayman v. Rao

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 25, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2021-2473Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LARRY E. KLAYMAN, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 21-cv-02473 (CRC) THE HONORABLE NEOMI RAO, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Larry E. Klayman, proceeding pro se, filed this action against the judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals for District of Columbia and two judges of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, alleging violations of his rights under the Due Process Clause and the First Amendment. The claimed “unconstitutional and illegal actions” of the defendants occurred during the course of two prior related cases…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Forrester v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API