Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Buckhannon Bank

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1935No. 8157PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatcher, Judge:

This is a suit in chancery. The plaintiff claims that he advanced to the defendant Bank the interest on certain notes held by it; that he was not responsible on the notes ■ that the defendant agreed to repay him the advances out of the first money it received on the notes from the makers or from a sale of their property; and that it did receive an ample sum to repay him from such sale, but refused to do so. Upon conflicting evidence, the circuit court found for plaintiff. The defendant appealed, contending, primarily, that equity has no jurisdiction.

The plaintiff takes the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Christmas v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Barnes v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. In re Interborough Consol. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  4. Crumlish's Adm'r v. Cent. Imp. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Neely v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1880

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Union Trust Co. of Maryland v. TownshendCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
  2. In re Lion Overall Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
  3. Sehon-Stevenson & Co. v. TownshendDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1940
  4. Union Trust Co. of Maryland v. TownshendCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
  5. Union Trust Co. of Maryland v. TownshendCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API