Union Trust Co. of Maryland v. Townshend
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1DissentSoper, Circuit Judge
The promise of Smith to pay the debt due by him to the Union Trust Company of Baltimore out of the proceeds of any sale of his property, did not give rise to a lien upon the property because it was not thereby placed beyond his control. Such a promise does not create a lien. Lone Star Cement Corp. v. Swartwout, 4 Cir., 93 F.2d 767, and cases cited; see, also, In re Interborough Consolidated Corp., 2 Cir., 288 F. 334, 32 A.L.R. 932; Long v. Farmers’ State Bank, 8 Cir., 147 F. 360, 9 L.R.A.,N.S., 585. So much is admitted; but it is said that when the property was sold, and the proceeds came…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Christmas v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Barnes v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- In re Interborough Consol. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Hicks v. Roanoke Brick Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1897
- Hibernian Banking Ass'n v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.