Legal Opinion

Ward v. Haggard

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 7679PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, C. J.

In this case the appellants, the defendants below, demurred to the appellee’s complaint, upon the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. This demurrer was overruled by the court, and to this ruling the appellants excepted. They declined 'to answer further, and the court rendered judgment against them for the amount found due the appellee on his alleged cause of action, and his costs of suit.

From this judgment this appeal is prosecuted, and the only error assigned here by the appellants is the overruling of their demurrer to appellee’s complaint.

In his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Howell v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1831
  2. Gould v. HaydenIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Black v. DuncanIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Rawley v. HookerIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Cissna v. HainesIndiana Supreme Court · 1862

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pence v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Mutual Benefit Life Ins. Co. v. Bachtenkircher, Rec.Indiana Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Huston v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Bryant v. OwensIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Pool v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API