Legal Opinion

Howell v. Wilson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1831PublishedCited by 41 opinions

ERROR to the Parke Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

Wilson, the assignee of a note, brought an action of assumpsit against Howell, the assignor. It was proved on the trial, that a note for the payment of money, given by Coleman Puit to Hozoell, bad been assigned by the latter for a valuable consideration to Wilson; and that an action by Wilson, the assignee, against Puit, the maker, bad been defeated by a plea of a failure of consideration. The defendant, Hozo*419ell, in the present action against him on the assignment, offered to prove that the consideration 'of the note was valid, and had not failed; but the evidence was rejected. The cause was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Maupin v. ComptonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1813

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. City of Rochester v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. Compania Transatlantica EspanolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Gray v. Boston Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  4. Carrico v. West Virginia Cent. & P. R'y Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Ashton v. . City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API