Legal Opinion

Kaiser Reismann Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 25, 1962No. 67068; protest 60/2555 (New York)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

This case originally came before the court on a stipulation of fact and submission. The stipulation was subsequently ordered withdrawn by the court and the matter placed on the calendar of the court for all purposes.

When this matter appeared on the court calendar, the original stipulation of submission was received in evidence as plaintiff’s exhibit 1. At this hearing, counsel for the Government moved to dismiss the protest on the grounds that it did not cover the merchandise of the subject stipulation.

The protest before the court, insofar as is pertinent herein, is written as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Arthur v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Davies v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. United States v. SalambierSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Carter v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  5. United States v. Sheldon & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chas. Kurz Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Superscope, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  3. Chas. Kurz Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API