Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Zierenberg

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1938No. Appeal, 38PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

The appellant herein has been three times tried on an indictment charging fornication and bastardy. In each of the first two trials the jury disagreed and the third resulted in a conviction and sentence was imposed upon both charges. Notwithstanding these several trials, we find it necessary to sustain the appellant’s third assignment of error, which relates to the reception of the jury’s verdict under circumstances which we will outline.

The jury sealed their verdict at 11 p. m. on the night of November 16, 1937, and then separated. Upon reassembling on the morning of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kramer v. KisterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  2. Eastley v. GlennSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Commonwealth v. EnglishSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Beecher v. NewcomerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Havranek v. PitssburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. State v. GulletteConnecticut Appellate Court · 1964
  3. Finn v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. State v. SpruillNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  5. Commonwealth v. LemleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API