Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lemley

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 24, 1945No. Appeals, 22 and 24PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, P. J.,

The question presented in this appeal is whether in a criminal case the commonwealth has the right to have the jury polled after a sealed verdict has been offered in open court?

Raymond Lemley, the appellant herein, was charged with the crimes of (1) public indecency, and (2) assault and battery. The jury retired in the afternoon and about four hours thereafter handed to the attending tipstaff two sealed verdicts. The next morning when the court reconvened, according to a statement of Judge Egan who presided at the trial, the sealed verdicts finding the defendant “not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kramer v. KisterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  2. Eastley v. GlennSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Rottmund v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. Commonwealth v. ZierenbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PatrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Commonwealth v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. State v. GulletteConnecticut Appellate Court · 1964
  4. State v. Blisak, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API