Legal Opinion

Havranek v. Pitssburgh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 25, 1942No. Appeals, 183 and 184PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern,

The question is whether the court below was justified in setting aside the verdict in this case on the alleged ground that not all the jurors assented to it.

Plaintiff, operating an automobile one evening on Liberty Avenue, Pittsburgh, drove it into a large hole, which he had failed to observe, adjacent to the street-car tracks, and sustained injuries as a result of the accident. He brought suit against the City of Pittsburgh, which issued a writ of scire facias against Pittsburgh Railways Company to bring it in as additional defendant. The jury rendered a verdict…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Friedman v. Ralph Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Kramer v. KisterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  3. Eastley v. GlennSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Rottmund v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  5. Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Maize v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. California Fruit Exchange v. HenryDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Wolfe v. RiggleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Finn v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Oblon v. Ludlow-Fourth Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API