Legal Opinion
Crosby v. Sears Holding Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 20, 2018No. 1:15-cv-06396Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CHRISTOPHER M. CROSBY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) 15 C 6396 v. ) Hon. Marvin E. Aspen ) SEARS HOLDING CORP., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARVIN E. ASPEN, District Judge: Presently before us is Plaintiff Christopher M. Crosby’s pro se motion against to vacate an arbitration award for Defendant Sears Roebuck and Co. (“Sears”) pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9 U.S.C. § 10. (First Am. Mot. (Dkt. No. 41).)1 For the reasons stated below, we deny Plaintiff’s motion. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Michael E. Wallace, David Jacaruso and Joseph Scotti v. Daljit S. Buttar and Paramjit Buttar, Robert Winston, AdditionalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Health Services Management Corp. v. Charles Hughes, D/B/A Charles Hughes & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.