Legal Opinion

Bambrick v. Asten Hill Mfg. Co.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 1972No. Appeals Nos. 867 C. D. 1971, 872 C. D. 1971, 873 C. D. 1971 and 912 C. D. 1971PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Wilkinson,

We are here concerned with three appeals which arise as a result of claims brought pursuant to Section 310(e) of the Pennsylvania Occupational Disease Act, Act of June 21, 1939, P. L. 566, No. 264, as amended, 77 P.S. §1401(e) which provides that “. . . Compensation shall be payable . . . for total disability or death caused by . . . asbestosis. . . .”

The three claimants, were successful before the referee and were awarded compensation. The defendants, Asten Hill Manufacturing Company, and its insurance carriers, State Workmen’s Insurance Fund and the Pennsylvania…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PatskinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. DeMascola v. LancasterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. DeFrank v. Sullivan Trail Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Consolidation Coal Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. UTTER v. Asten-Hill Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Hinkle v. HJ Heinz CompanyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Fetzer v. MichrinaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API