Legal Opinion

Piedmont Bank v. Hatcher

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 14, 1897PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of Orange county-pronounced March 1, 1894, in a suit in chancery wherein the appellants were the complainants, and the appellees were the defendants.

1Opinion of the Court

Buchanan. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The object of this suit was to set aside a conveyance of certain lands upon the ground that it was made to hinder, delay, and defraud the creditors of the grantor, and to subject the lands to the payment of certain negotiable notes held by the complainants, the appellants here.

The answer of one of the makers of the notes denied that the payee endorsed them to the complainant as alleged in the bill, and this denial is supported by an affidavit in accordance with the provisions of sec. 3279 of the Code. Upon that issue it was the duty of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New York Mutual Life Insurance v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Lincoln v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Butler v. WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. Wilson v. LazierSupreme Court of Virginia · 1854

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. McGowanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  2. Cochran v. ParisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1854
  3. Duncan v. CarsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  4. Catron v. BosticSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  5. Atkinson v. NeblettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API