Legal Opinion
Atkinson v. Neblett
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided March 18, 1926PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
The judgment under review was obtained by the defendants in error (plaintiffs in the court below) against the plaintiff in error (hereinafter called defendant) upon a negotiable note executed by W. C. Atkin.son, E. F. Roper and W. J. Mathews.
It appears from the record that Atkinson, on the *22429th day of September, 1923, at the request of Mathews, went to Lunenburg county, Virginia, for the purpose of inspecting a tract of timber which they contemplated buying. After looking over the timber boundary, Mathews took Atkinson to a bank in Victoria, Virginia, and introduced him to the plaintiffs,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- W. S. Forbes & Co. v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1921
- Collins v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Joy v. . DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Cox v. HaganSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
- Porterfield v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Shifflett v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
- Citizens Nat. Bank of Orange, Va. v. WaughCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- University of Richmond v. StoneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
- Richardson v. BreedingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1936
- Merchants & Planters Bank v. ForneySupreme Court of Virginia · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.