Ristaino v. Flannery
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
RODOWSKY, Judge.
This automobile collision, personal injury case was tried before a jury and resulted in a defendant’s verdict. We granted certiorari to consider the following question:
“Is it reversible error to instruct the jury that the mere happening of the accident creates no presumption of negligence on the part of the defendant where the manner in which the accident happened does indeed create a rebuttable presumption of negligence?”
As explained below, our forthright answer is, “It all depends.” In the case before us the giving of the instruction constituted reversible error.
Petitioners,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Shaw v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Kelly v. Huber Baking Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
- Grier v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Cocco v. LissauCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
- Pindell v. RubensteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dover Elevator Co. v. SwannCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Kennelly v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Ferguson Trenching Co. Inc. v. KiehneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Mitchell v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Rustin v. SmithCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.