Legal Opinion

Rustin v. Smith

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 28, 1995No. 1287PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLANDER, Judge.

A jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City found appellants Gary Rustin and Yellow Van Services, Inc.,1 negligent in connection with the operation of a motor vehicle and awarded Violet Smith, appellee, over $57,000 in damages. Rustin and Yellow Van Services, Inc. have appealed, contesting the circuit court’s refusal to instruct the jury as to “acts in emergencies.” We hold that the trial court correctly concluded that the evidence did not support the instruction. Our holding is premised on Rustin’s failure to present any evidence that he took any action in response to the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Burhans v. BurhansCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
  2. Lehmann v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  3. Armstrong v. Johnson Motor Lines, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  4. Consolidated Gas, Electric Light & Power Co. v. O'NeillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  5. E.G. Rock, Inc. v. DanlyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hall v. LOVELL REGENCY HOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIPCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. PittsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. Haney v. GregoryCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Lashbrooks v. SchultzIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Gables Constr., Inc. v. Red Coats, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API