Tri-State Asphalt Products, Inc. v. Dravo Corp.

This contract dispute between Tri-State Asphalt Products, Inc., and Dravo Corporation resulted in the Circuit Court of Wood County’s granting two summary judgments, one in favor of Tri-State on its complaint ($34,091.86) and the other, in favor of Dravo on its counterclaim ($61,-166.35). On appeal, Tri-State contends that the summary judgment granted in favor of Dravo was in error because the parties’ agreement was ambiguous and subject to differing interpretations. Because we do not find that the circuit court erred in deciding that the contract was unambiguous, we affirm the decision of the…