Boushiar v. . Willis
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The temporary restraining order was properly continued to the hearing. Wentz v. Land Co., 193 N. C., 32, 135 S. E., 480.
It is the general practice of equity courts, upon proper showing for injunctive relief, to continue the temporary restraining order to the final hearing, when it appears that no harm can come to the respondents from such continuance, and great injury might result to the petitioners from a dissolution of the injunction. Parker Co. v. Bank, 200 N. C., 441, 157 S. E., 419; Thomason v. Swenson, 204 N. C., 759, 169 S. E., 620. “Where it will not harm the defendant to continue the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Seip v. . WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- S. B. Parker Co. v. Commercial National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Wentz v. Piedmont Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Thomason v. . SwensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Buchanan v. . Feldspar Milling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lance v. CogdillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Huskins v. Yancey HospitalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Huskins v. Yancey Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Roberts v. Town of CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Banner v. Carolina Button Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.