Legal Opinion

Bolling v. Ford

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 5, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Drury, Commissioner

Reversing.

The appellant, J. M. Bolling, whom we will call the plaintiff, sought to recover damages of the appellees, J. W. Ford, J. E. Ratliff and W. B. Taylor, whom we will call the trustees, for breach of trust. .He was unsuccessful, and has appealed. At the outset, we think it well to explain that the correct spelling of this name, as shown by the signatures of parties in this record, is- “B-o-1-1i-n-g.” In many places it is spelled “B-o-w-l-i-n-g,” both in this record and the two former opinions, which are reported in 172 Ky. 32, 188 S. W. 1070,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fox v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
  2. Bowling v. BowlingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Johnson v. BowlingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. PCR Contractors, Inc. v. DanialCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2011
  2. Johnson v. CormneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979
  3. PBI Bank, Inc. v. Signature Point Condominiums LLCCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2016
  4. Ross v. PowellKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Bryan v. Security Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API