Legal Opinion

People v. Brian

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided August 14, 1980No. Crim. A. No. 17117PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SAETA, J.

A jury found defendant guilty of violating Penal Code section 597, subdivision (b). The charge involved neglect of animals she owned.1 On appeal defendant claims that the evidence was insufficient to show that she had the intent to harm or neglect her animals.

*Supp. 3The facts are presented to us in a settled statement which presents a sometimes disjointed summary of the many witnesses’ testimony. Defendant owned three horses, several dogs, cats, goats and some fowl. In July 1978 she left her home for an eastern trip. She told her stepfather (Duff) and a feedstore employee…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. BarrazaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People v. PennyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. People v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. People v. PeabodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. RiazatiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. People v. SargentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. Adams CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. People v. SargentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API