Legal Opinion

BULLEN

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1977No. ID 2621PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #2621 MATTER OF SULLEN In Visa Petition Proceedings A-21778510 Decided by Board November 7, 1977 (1) In visa petition proceedings, the burden of establishing the claimed relationship is upon the petitioner. (2) In order to qualify as a "daughter" for preference purposes under section 203(a)(2) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 1153(a)(2), the beneficiary must once have qualified as the child of the petitioner under section 101(b)(1) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(I). (3) The term "legitimate" as used in section 101(b)(1)(A), 8 U.S.C. 111)1(a)(1)(A), refers solely to a child born in wedlock.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. BRANTIGANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1966
  2. Vicente Villamosa Nazareno v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  3. KUBICKABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1972
  4. DELA ROSABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1974

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. HERNANDEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1983
  2. VIZCAINOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
  3. MORAGABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2001
  4. ODUROBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1983
  5. LEVYBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API