Vicente Villamosa Nazareno v. Attorney General of the United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge:
Appellants, Fe Nazareno and Enrique Templora Targa, are unmarried adult aliens who where adopted pursuant to state judicial decrees in 1970 and 1972 respectively. 1 The Immigration and Naturalization Service denied petitions filed by their adoptive parents to classify them as the daughter and son of United States citizens for purposes of qualifying under the first preference classification of 8 U.S.C. § 1153 (1970). Following unsuccessful efforts before the Board of Immigration Appeals, appellants filed an action for declaratory judgment and for review in the United…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Power Reactor Development Co. v. International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Russell E. Train, in His Official Capacity as Administrator, Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Jean v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Bautista Castillo-Felix v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Michele Chiaramonte v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Praman Chiravacharadhikul A.K.A. Praman Chiravacharadhijul v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Chinese American Civic Council v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.