Legal Opinion

McEwen v. B. P. Shannon & Co.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 15, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Assumpsit. Heard at tlie February "term, 1892, Start, J., presiding, upon the report of a referee. Judgment pro forma for tbe defendants to recover $106.92. Tbe plaintiff excepts. The opinion states the case. .If the contract was illegal a payment under it cannot be recovered. Burt v. Place, 6 Cowen 131; Foote dc Stone v. Emerson, 10 Yt. 337. One partner can bind the firm as to all acts relating to the business.

Read the full summary

Assumpsit. Heard at tlie February "term, 1892, Start, J., presiding, upon the report of a referee. Judgment pro forma for tbe defendants to recover $106.92. Tbe plaintiff excepts. The opinion states the case. .If the contract was illegal a payment under it cannot be recovered. Burt v. Place, 6 Cowen 131; Foote dc Stone v. Emerson, 10 Yt. 337. One partner can bind the firm as to all acts relating to the business. Winship v. U. S. Banh, 5 Peters, 525-561; Sandilands V. Marsh, 2 B. & Aid. 673; Bond v. Gibson, 1 Camp. 185. The wife of B. P. Shannon was not a competent witness. Carpenter v. Moore,…

1Opinion of the Court

*585The opinion of the court was delivered by

ROSS, Ch. J.

From the report of the referee and auditor,, it appears, that, in the spring of 1888, the defendant, B. P. Shannon and others were interested in having a creamery established in the town of Craftsbury. For its establishment it was necessary to induce the farmers in the vicinity to adopt uniform regulations for producing pure cream, by the use of the Cooley Creamers ; and to patronize a creamery for its manufacture into butter. It could not be expected that one patron would pay 'more than another for gathering and manufacturing cream into…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tatum v. KelleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1868
  2. of Carpenter v. MooreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1871
  3. Paddock v. FletcherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1869
  4. Bonett ex rel. Bonett v. StowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1864
  5. Administrator of Martin v. MartinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1828

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Western Nat. Life Ins. v. Williamson-Halsell-Frasier Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Moe v. LowrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  3. Noble v. FoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Jackson v. BryantOhio Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Moe v. LowrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API