Moe v. Lowry
Supreme Court of Colorado
Action for the cancellation of corporate stock alleged to have been obtained without consideration. Judgment for plaintiffs. Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. Julian H. Moore, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
1. JOINT ADVENTURERS — Fair Dealing. Each of several joint adventurers owes to the others absolute good faith, open and honorable dealing, free from deception and concealment.
2. RIGHTS AND REMEDIES — Decree. In an action by stockholders of a corporation against one who has obtained stock in the company without consideration, the relief granted is sufficient if there is a correct enforcement of the rights of the parties as shown by the evidence.
3. JOINT ADVENTURERS — Secret Profit. In the case of a secret profit by a joint adventurer, he must disgorge all that he surreptitiously acquired.
4.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Getty v. . DevlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Grant v. HardyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
- Reyer v. BlaisdellColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
- Walker v. Pike County Land Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Getty v. . DevlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Donahue v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Lindsay v. MarcusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
- Kincaid v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
- Johnson v. IronsideMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Hanson v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.