Legal Opinion

Tatum v. Kelley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 15, 1868PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Union Circuit Court. Hon. John T. Bearden, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtIIarrison, J.

This is an action on a promissory note for one thousand dollars, made by defendants to F, L. Gilbko, dated July 11, 1861, and payable’ on the 1st day of March, thereafter, indorsed to I. F. J. Spach, and by him to the plaintiff.

The defendants, besides the general issue, pleaded, first, that the consideration of the note were guns, purchased from the payee by the defendants, to arm men to wage war against' the United States, in the rebellion, which intention and purpose, were well known to the payee at the time of the sale; secondly,} in addition to the above averments, the plaintiff' knew…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. TolerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  2. Pratt v. AdamsNew York Court of Chancery · 1839
  3. Steele v. CurleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1836
  4. Branch Bank at Montgomery v. CrocheronSupreme Court of Alabama · 1843

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass'n v. MasonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Standard Furniture Co. v. Van AlstineWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Blunk v. WaughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Grover v. ZookWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Neece v. JosephSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API