Legal Opinion

Peske v. Tangedahl

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 14, 1980No. 79-1595PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

North Dakota operates an Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program pursuant to Title IV of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 601 et seq. (1976). Bonnie Peske and other similarly situated recipients of grants under North Dakota’s AFDC program (Peske) appeal from a district court judgment dismissing their complaint against the executive director and members of the Social Service Board of North Dakota (the Board). The district court determined that under Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights Organization, 441 U.S. 600, 99 S.Ct. 1905, 60 L.Ed.2d 508 (1979), it lacked subject matter…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Oldham v. EhrlichCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  4. Herweg v. RayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Davis v. ReagenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  2. Annex Medical, Inc. v. Kathleen SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  3. Peske v. TangedahlCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  4. Davis v. ReagenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  5. Annex Medical, Inc. v. Kathleen SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API