Legal Opinion
Annex Medical, Inc. v. Kathleen Sebelius
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 6, 2014No. 13-1118PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RILEY, Chief Judge.
In this Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) case challenging the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) contraceptive mandate under 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb-l(a),2 Annex Medical, Inc. (Annex), Stuart Lind, and Tom Janas appeal the district court’s refusal to enjoin preliminarily the government from enforcing the mandate.
*581I. BACKGROUND
Annex is a for-profit Minnesota corporation and at the time of filing had sixteen full-time employees and two part-time employees. When Annex filed this lawsuit, one of the ways Annex compensated its employees was by paying for a Blue…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- MPAY Inc. v. Erie Custom ComputerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- Douglas Sellner v. MAT Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Real Alternatives, Inc. v. BurwellDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015