Satack v. State, Department of Public Safety
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
PETERSON, Justice.
The Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals denied compensation to relator, a *557state employee, who was injured when she fell on a public sidewalk close to her place of employment, holding that because her injury did not occur on her employer’s premises, she did not sustain an injury arising out of and in the course of employment. Relator seeks review by writ of certiorari. We affirm.
The so-called “premises requirement” is set forth in Minn.St. 176.011, subd. 16, which provides in pertinent part:
“ ‘Personal injury’ means injury arising out of and in the course of employment * *…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Simonson v. KnightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Bales, Admx. v. Service Club No. 1, Camp ChaffeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
- Johannsen v. ACTION CONSTRUCTION CO. INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Goff v. Farmers Union Accounting Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Sommers v. Schuler Chocolates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Foley v. Honeywell, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Gibberd Ex Rel. Gibberd v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Blanks v. Oak Ridge Nursing HomeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Hohlt v. University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Schander v. Northern States Power CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.