Legal Opinion

McDonnell v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 8, 2003No. 03-1657PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Thomas McDonnell appeals a reduction of his monthly annuity from the Railroad Retirement Board. McDonnell was granted annuities by both the Board and the Social Security Administration. Upon learning that McDonnell was receiving social security benefits, the Board recalculated its award and determined that a 1974 amendment to the Railroad Retirement Act required it to reduce its annuity dollar-for-dollar by the amount of McDonnell’s social security benefits. After McDonnell complained about this reduction, the Board reconsidered the award and discovered that he was owed a “vested dual…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Clinton T. Frock and Charles L. Stribling v. United States Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  3. Roger D. Holman v. United States Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  4. Coker v. GielowCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  5. Janet K. Steiger, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. United States Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. MACOLINO v. TOWNSHIP OF LOWER MORELANDDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API