Legal Opinion
Coker v. Gielow
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 3, 1986No. 85-3864PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RALPH B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Claimant, Jamie Coker, appeals from the decision of the Railroad Retirement Board, contending that the Board improperly computed the amount of his annuity. Finding no error in the computations, we affirm.
Plaintiff essentially argues (1) that his social security benefit amount of $404.00 granted upon his application at age 65, rather than his previous early retirement award of only $279.00, should have increased his railroad retirement annuity proportionately; and (2) that as a “dual vested employee” he is entitled to receive his railroad annuity without…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union No. 103, International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ford Motor Co. (Chicago Stamping Plant) v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Environmental Protection Agency v. National Crushed Stone Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Coker v. GielowCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- McCole v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- McDonnell v. United States Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Billy H. Hensley v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Jamie E. Coker v. U.S. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.