Legal Opinion

Clinton T. Frock and Charles L. Stribling v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 6, 1982No. 81-2187, 81-2637PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUER, Circuit Judge.

These petitions involve the applicability of section 3(h)(6) of the Railroad Retirement Act, 45 U.S.C. § 231b(h)(6), to railroad workers applying for dual benefits fol lowing this court’s decision in Gebbie v. United States Railroad Retirement Board, 631 F.2d 512 (7th Cir. 1980), and the constitutionality of that section if it is applied to these workers. Because we find that section 3(h)(6) was correctly applied and is constitutional, we uphold the Railroad Retirement Board’s decisions denying dual benefits to the petitioners.

I

Clinton T. Frock and Charles L. Stribling…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. John NataleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  2. Isaacs v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  3. Isaacs v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  4. Ritter v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  5. Cronin v. Town of AmesburyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API