Updegrave v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Mencer,
Dr. William Updegrave and his wife Sara Jane (appellants) sought a variance from the Philadelphia *453Zoning Board of Adjustment (Board) so that they might convert their property, located at 417 West School House Lane in Philadelphia, from a dentist’s office and residence, a permitted use in the applicable E-10A district, to a two-apartment dwelling, a use which is not permitted in E-10A zones. The Board twice rejected appellants’ request, and the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County affirmed the Board. Appellants then pursued their appeal to this Court.
Where, as in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Richman v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Harper v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Szmigiel v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Alfano v. Zoning H. Bd. of Marple Twp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Sposato v. Radnor Township BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
3Cited by7 opinions
- Baker v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- General Battery Corp. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Eighteenth & Rittenhouse Associates v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Appeal of Nardozza From Decision of Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- BP Oil, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.