Legal Opinion

Sposato v. Radnor Township Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1970No. Appeal, No. 6PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Jones,

Dr. James Westerman owns an 18.5 acre tract in Radnor Township which is presently zoned R-4 Residential. On December 31, 1965, Dr. Westerman agreed to sell the tract to Richard Sposato, the agreement of sale being contingent upon Sposato obtaining a zoning classification which would permit him to build garden apartments thereon. Following a public hearing on March 21, 1967, Sposato’s proposal that the tract be rezoned was denied by the Board of Commissioners of Radnor Township.

Sposato next applied for a building certificate to permit the construction of 222-unit…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cleaver v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Richman v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Pyzdrowski v. Pittsburgh Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Lukens v. Ridley Township Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Jacobs v. FetzerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Vanguard Cellular System, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Marple Gardens, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Alfano v. Zoning H. Bd. of Marple Twp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Surrick v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Logan Square Neighborhood Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API