Legal Opinion

Eighteenth & Rittenhouse Associates v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 14, 1976No. Appeal, No. 417 C.D. 1975PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

This is a zoning appeal by Eighteenth & Rittenhouse Associates (Appellant) from an order of the court of common pleas affirming the Zoning Board of Adjustment’s (ZBA) refusal to grant a variance for the use,1 of the premises, 250 South 18th Street (“250”). “250” is located in an area zoned “R-16” Residential where the proposed offices and savings and loan uses are not permitted.

*556In 1970, Appellant’s predecessor in interest received a variance from the court of common pleas for a twenty-seven unit apartment house with four non-conforming doctors’ offices and a real…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Grace Building Co. v. Hatfield TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Township of Haverford v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Delaware County Investment Corp. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Updegrave v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Heller v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Marshall v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Center City Residents Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Kensington South Neighborhood Advisory Council v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Solow v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. West Torresdale Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API