Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Residex Corporation v. Farrow

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 26, 1974No. Civ. A. 73-1782, 73-1826PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

HANNUM, District Judge.

Presently before the Court are Motions for Change of Venue in both the Robinson, etc. v. Co-Build Companies, Inc., et al. and the Residex Corporation v. Farrow et al. cases (hereinafter the Robinson and Residex cases, respectively). Due to the similarity of the issues and the parties involved in the two cases, it is appropriate that both cases should either stay in this district or both be transferred. Therefore, the two motions will be decided together.

The plaintiff in, the Residex case brought the action August 6, 1973 to recover damages allegedly…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Schneider v. SearsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  2. Peyser v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  3. Clendenin v. United Fruit Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Grubs v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 1960
  5. Detrick v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Blinzler v. Marriott International, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1994
  2. In Re Nematron Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  3. Kisko v. Penn Central Transportation Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Micheel v. HaralsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Bergman v. BraininDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API