Legal Opinion

Micheel v. Haralson

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 9, 1983No. Civ. A. 82-247PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM and ORDER

SHAPIRO, District Judge.

This action has been filed by plaintiff, Richard J. Micheel, a Pennsylvania resident. Defendant Daniel B. Haralson, an Alabama resident, has moved to dismiss the complaint or in the alternative to transfer to Alabama pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). For the reasons that follow, the motions are denied.

On or about October 25, 1979, plaintiff entered into an agreement with defendant and several other persons and corporations 1 to purchase the shares of common stock of an Alabama corporation, Leedy, Inc. 2 Micheel filed this suit against Haral son after…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Continental Grain Co. v. Barge FBL-585Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Shutte v. Armco Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Diversified Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Delgado v. Plaza Las Americas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  3. Houk v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
  4. Princess House, Inc. v. LindseyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
  5. City of Littleton v. Commercial Union Assurance CompaniesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1990

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API