Legal Opinion

United States v. Cornelius J. Kehoe and Ray K. Bullock

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 16, 1975No. 74-2353PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge:

Presented for decision in this § 3731 appeal is a question expressly left open by the Supreme Court in its recent double jeopardy trilogy. In Serfass v. United States, 1975, 420 U.S. 377, 95 S.Ct. 1055, 43 L.Ed.2d 265, the Court declined to “intimate any view concerning the case put by the Solicitor General, of ‘a defendant who is afforded an opportunity to obtain a determination of a legal defense prior to the trial and nevertheless knowingly allows himself to be placed in jeopardy before raising the defense.’ ” 420 U.S. at 394, 95 S.Ct. at 1065, 43 L.Ed.2d at 277.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. Stephen J. FlemmiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  2. County of Los Alamos v. TapiaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  3. United States v. Frank RaganoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. Robert M. Kane, in Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  5. United States v. James Junior FinchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API