Legal Opinion

County of Los Alamos v. Tapia

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1990No. 18304PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MONTGOMERY, Justice.

In the trial of a criminal case, after jeopardy attaches,1 one of three outcomes is possible: The trial may be completed and the defendant acquitted; the trial may be completed and the defendant convicted; or the trial may not be completed at all, in which case it will have been aborted by some ruling of the trial court. In the first situation, it has been settled for almost a century that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution2 preeludes further prosecution of the defendant. United States v. Ball, 163 U.S. 662, 669, 16 S.Ct. 1192, 1194, 41…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. State v. HeinsenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. LynchNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. FosterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. State v. VaughnNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. State v. TreadwayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API