Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Manufacturers' Finance Acceptance Corp.

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 1932No. 6 Div. 9PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause is submitted here on appellant’s motion to establish a bill of exceptions under and in pursuance of the terms of Code 1923, S 6435.

It appears without conflict that, judgment against them, in a suit brought by appellee, being rendered in the lower court, they thereafter in due time prepared and presented to the trial judge a purported bill of exceptions in furtherance of their legally declared intention of appealing from the said judgment to this court.

It is further without conflict that the trial judge retained said bill of exceptions for more than sixty days, without approving…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sovereign Camp of Woodmen of the World v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Fries v. Acme White Lead & Color WorksAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Eason v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Finney v. SullivanAlabama Court of Appeals · 1927
  5. Browning v. LockettAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McRee v. RussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Faust v. BakerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Thompson v. Manufacturers' Finance Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API