Legal Opinion

Browning v. Lockett

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1930No. 5 Div. 812PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

To entitle appellant to the relief he seeks by this motion it must be made to appear that within the time allowed by law he presented to the judge presiding at the trifii a bill of exceptions stating the points of decision and the facts which must be truly stated. That means, of course, that the points and facts must be stated as they occurred on the trial in every substantial particular. In this case we find that this has not been done, and section 6435 of the Code of 1923, under which this motion is filed, being highly penal, we must hold the appellant to the letter of the statute.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sovereign Camp of Woodmen of the World v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Fries v. Acme White Lead & Color WorksAlabama Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Eason v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Finney v. SullivanAlabama Court of Appeals · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Manufacturers' Finance Acceptance Corp.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Faust v. BakerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API