Legal Opinion
Carlson v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 13, 1984No. C1-84-1103PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
Paul Orlyn Carlson appeals from the trial court’s decision sustaining the revocation of his driver’s license pursuant to the implied consent law. We affirm.
FACTS
On February 26, 1984, Paul Orlyn Carlson was arrested for driving while under the influence of alcohol and failing to stop at a stop sign. The arresting officer offered Carlson a breath test, as provided under Minnesota’s implied consent law, Minn.Stat. § 169.123, subd. 2 (Supp.1983). Carlson refused a breath test and instead requested a blood test. The officer refused to provide a blood test, and Carlson’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Heddan v. DirkswagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State, City of St. Louis Park v. QuinnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- State, Department of Public Safety v. HabischSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. BolandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
3Cited by4 opinions
- Meyers v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Forrest v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Swedzinski v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Bryce Edward Ramthun v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014