Legal Opinion
State v. Boland
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 19, 1974No. 44154PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court which affirmed an order of the commissioner of public safety revoking defendant’s driver’s license for refusal to permit chemical testing under Minn. St. 169.123. We affirm.
Minn. St. 169.123, subd. 2, provides in part as follows:
“Any person who drives or operates a motor vehicle upon the public highways of this state shall be deemed to have given consent * * * to a chemical test of his blood, breath, or urine for the purpose of determining the alcoholic content of his blood. The test shall be administered at the direction of a peace…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State, Department of Public Safety v. NystromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- State, Department of Highways v. McWhiteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Matter of Suspension of Operating Privilege of BardwellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- State, Department of Public Safety v. LauzonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Haugen v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Meyers v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Driver v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.