City of St. Louis v. Brune
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
DONNELLY, Presiding Judge.
Appellant, Paul F. Bruñe, an owner of rental property in the City of St. Louis, was convicted and fined in the St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction for violation of. Ordinance 51637, which provides, in part, that every dwelling unit “shall have a tub or shower bath in good working condition, properly connected to approved hot and cold water and sewer systems in the toilet room or in a separate room adjacent to such dwelling unit.”
Appellant concedes that he is in violation of the ordinance. He contends on appeal (and contended before and during the trial) that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Bellerive Investment Co. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- City of Louisville v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
- Safer v. City of JacksonvilleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
- Dente v. City of Mount VernonNew York Supreme Court · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- STATE EX REL. STATE HWY. COM'N, ETC. v. TateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. TateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- City of St. Louis v. BruneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- City of St. Louis v. BruneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- State Ex Rel. Scott v. RoperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.