State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Tate
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
WELLIVER, Judge.
This case raises the issue whether appellant, the State Highway Commission, has the right to introduce evidence of special benefits in a condemnation proceeding. We hold that appellant does have that right, and reverse and remand for a new trial.
The State Highway Commission filed a petition on September 5, 1973, seeking to condemn an easement across a quantity of land for the relocation of Route 60 and reconstruction of Route 95 in Mountain Grove, Missouri. Land belonging to respondents was ordered condemned for this purpose on October 9,1973. The landowner, J. C. Young, held…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. ClevengerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Vorhof-Duenke Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Southern Development Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. BuysMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Delmar Gardens of Chesterfield, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. GatsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- STATE EX REL. STATE HWY. COM'N, ETC. v. TateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. ReckerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.