Legal Opinion

United States v. Gold

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 4, 1940No. 81PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

These appeals are from judgments of conviction of the accused for a conspiracy to restrain trade in violation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1-7, 15 note. The only .question we shall consider is whether the evidence supports the verdict, the facts which the jury might have found to be proved being as follows. About ninety per cent of the manufacturers of fur garments in the United States do their business in the City of New York, buying the raw skins from dealers who have imported them from foreign countries and other states. TÍie first process of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Duplex Printing Press Co. v. DeeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Loewe v. LawlorSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Bedford Cut Stone Co. v. Journeymen Stone Cutters' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Coronado Coal Co. v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. CarrozzoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1941
  2. Philadelphia Record Co. v. Manufacturing Photo-Engravers Ass'n of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
  3. United States v. Local 807 of International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Stablemen & Helpers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  4. Carroll v. American Federation Of MusiciansCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  5. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Donnelly Garment Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API