Legal Opinion
United States v. Carrozzo
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 7, 1941No. 32271PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
Objections third and fourth as to substance, and objection fifth, will be first considered.
The offense charged in the present indictment is a combination and conspiracy in restraint of trade, in violation of Section One of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1, which provides: “Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is hereby declared to be illegal.”
The indictment charges the defendants with “knowingly having entered into and engaged in a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Intercontinental Container Transport Corporation v. New York Shipping Association, Inc. And International Longshoremen's AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- United States v. American Federation of MusiciansDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1942
- Lumber Products Ass'n v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- United States v. San Francisco Electrical Contractors Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1944
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.