Legal Opinion
Hogan v. 50 Sutton Place South Owners, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 29, 1996No. 94 Civ. 5700 (JGK)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KOELTL, District Judge:
The plaintiff William J. Hogan (“Hogan”) alleges in the Amended Complaint that he was wrongfully discharged from his position as a doorman at 50 Sutton Place South, (Amended Complaint ¶¶ 29, 40), in violation of §§ 703 and 704(2) of the New York Labor Law and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5 et seq. The Amended Complaint also alleges that his union, Local 32B-32J of the Service Employees International Union (the “Union”), breached its duty of fair representation in handling Hogan’s arbitration regarding his termination, and…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Branker v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Ali v. Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Paper, Allied-Industrial, Chemical & Energy Workers International Union, Local 1-9 v. S.D. Warren Co.District Court, D. Maine · 2005