Legal Opinion
Kellogg Switchboard & Supply Co. v. New York Telephone Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided February 13, 1931No. Nos. 350, 351PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ADLER, District Judge.
This is a motion to dismiss the complaint because of failure to comply with Equity Rule 25.
The relevant provisions of Equity Rule 25 (28 USCA § 723) require that a bill in equity shall contain: “Third, a short and simple statement of the ultimate facts upon which the plaintiff asks relief omitting any mere statement of evidence.”
*617Paragraph 13 of the complaint, after reciting1 that “plaintiff alleges, upon information and belief, that the defendant, American Telephone & Telegraph Company, has had full and complete knowledge and notice of the aforesaid patents Nos.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Universal Oil Products Co. v. Skelly Oil Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1926
- Bayley & Sons, Inc. v. Braunstein Bros.District Court, S.D. New York · 1916
- Foster v. Callaghan & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1918
- Hodgman v. Atlantic Refining Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1921
- Davis v. Motive Parts Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Maytag Co. v. Brooklyn Edison Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1933